Twitter Cancels AMP

No Comments
Twitter cancels amp
TL;DR: In late 2021 Twitter announced it would stop redirecting mobile users to AMP versions of pages, and by early 2022 the redirection was gone. If Twitter was the main reason you kept AMP alive, that reason no longer exists. Check your traffic mix, then plan a clean migration off AMP with proper redirects.
What happened
Twitter stopped serving AMP links
When
Announced Q4 2021, done by early 2022
Who it affects
Publishers still running AMP pages
Ranking impact
None directly, AMP was never a ranking factor outside Top Stories
Action
Audit AMP traffic, plan your exit

What Twitter actually changed

For years, Twitter did something most users never noticed: when you tapped a link on the mobile app or mobile web, Twitter checked whether the destination page declared an AMP version via the amphtml link element. If it did, Twitter quietly rewrote the link and sent you to the AMP page instead of the URL the publisher actually shared. Publishers opted in simply by having AMP pages at all.

In the fourth quarter of 2021, Twitter updated its developer documentation to say it would stop this behavior, and by the first quarter of 2022 the AMP redirection was fully retired. From that point on, a link shared on Twitter goes exactly where it says it goes: the canonical page.

That sounds like a small plumbing change. In practice it removed one of the last non-Google reasons to maintain a parallel AMP codebase.

BEFORE (until early 2022) User taps link in Twitter app Twitter rewrites URL to the amphtml target AMP page loads (often from AMP cache)

AFTER (Q1 2022 onward) User taps link in Twitter app no rewrite, direct to shared URL Canonical page loads on your own domain Result: Twitter referral traffic now lands on canonical URLs, with your analytics, your ads, and your full template.

Why Twitter dropped it, and why the timing made sense

Twitter never explained its reasoning in depth, but the context does the explaining for it. Google's page experience update, which rolled out in June 2021, removed the AMP requirement for the Top Stories carousel and dropped the AMP badge from mobile results. Once any fast page could qualify for Top Stories, AMP lost its single biggest carrot. Publishers who had grudgingly maintained AMP purely for that carousel started asking what else was keeping it alive.

Twitter's redirection was one of the honest answers. It was the largest non-Google surface still preferentially serving AMP. When that went away, the ecosystem argument for AMP got noticeably thinner. Cloudflare and Bing had AMP-related projects too, but neither drove meaningful publisher traffic the way Twitter's in-app browser did.

There was also a user experience angle that publishers complained about for years: Twitter users landing on AMP cache URLs saw cdn.ampproject.org style addresses instead of the publisher's domain, share buttons captured the wrong URL, and paywalled or personalized experiences frequently broke. Killing the redirect fixed all of that in one move.

Timeline: how AMP lost its grip

EventWhenWhy it mattered
Google launches AMPOctober 2015Mobile pages served from Google's cache, near-instant loads
AMP required for Top Stories2016 onwardNews publishers effectively forced to adopt AMP for carousel visibility
Page experience update removes AMP requirementJune 2021Any page meeting performance criteria can appear in Top Stories; AMP badge removed
Twitter announces end of AMP redirectionQ4 2021Stated in Twitter's developer documentation, retirement planned by Q1 2022
Twitter redirection fully retiredEarly 2022Twitter mobile traffic lands on canonical URLs again
Major publishers publicly drop AMP2021 to 2023With no carousel requirement and no Twitter redirect, the maintenance cost stopped paying for itself

What this did to your analytics

If you ran AMP through this period, you probably saw the shift in your data without anyone telling you why. Here is what I saw on publisher accounts I worked on:

AMP pageviews dropped, canonical mobile pageviews rose. The total was roughly flat, the composition changed. If someone on your team panicked about "AMP traffic collapsing" in early 2022, this was almost certainly the cause.

Twitter referrals became easier to attribute. AMP cache pageviews were a well known attribution mess: sessions split between the cache domain and your own, referrer data mangled, and separate AMP analytics configs that never quite matched the main property. Traffic landing directly on canonical pages fixed a chunk of that for free.

Engagement metrics on Twitter traffic often improved. Users landed on the full template with working navigation, correct share URLs, and whatever monetization you actually intended. AMP pages were frequently the stripped-down, worst-earning version of a page.

Should you still be running AMP at all?

My honest take: for most sites in 2026, no. AMP solved a real problem in 2016, when the median mobile page was a bloated disaster. But the problem AMP solved is now solved better by just building fast pages. Core Web Vitals gives you the measurement framework, and modern frameworks plus a decent CDN get you the speed without maintaining two versions of every template.

The decision is not automatic, though. Run the numbers first:

Check what percentage of your organic and social traffic still lands on AMP URLs. Look in Google Search Console (filter performance by AMP search appearance) and your analytics platform. If AMP is under 5 percent of traffic and falling, the maintenance cost of a second rendering path, a second analytics config, and a second ad setup is buying you nothing.

If you do migrate off, do it properly: remove the amphtml link elements from canonical pages, then 301 redirect every AMP URL to its canonical equivalent. Google has confirmed AMP pages drop out of the cache and index naturally after that. Do not just delete the AMP pages and serve 404s; they have inbound links and cached references you want to consolidate.

DO
  • Measure how much traffic still hits AMP URLs before deciding anything
  • 301 redirect AMP URLs to canonicals if you retire AMP
  • Remove amphtml link elements as part of the same deploy
  • Invest the freed-up dev time in Core Web Vitals on your real pages
  • Watch Search Console for a few weeks after migrating to catch redirect gaps
DON'T
  • Keep AMP running "just in case" with nobody maintaining it
  • Delete AMP pages to 404 instead of redirecting them
  • Assume dropping AMP will hurt rankings; AMP was never a ranking factor
  • Blame a Twitter traffic dip in 2022 on your content; check the AMP shift first
  • Adopt AMP for a new site in 2026; that ship has sailed

FAQ

Did Twitter dropping AMP hurt anyone's rankings?
No. Twitter's redirect was a traffic routing behavior, not a search signal. AMP itself was only ever a requirement for the Top Stories carousel, and Google removed that requirement in June 2021. What changed was where Twitter clicks landed, not how pages ranked.
Is AMP officially dead?
The open source project still exists and some publishers still run it, so "dead" overstates it. But every major incentive that pushed publishers into AMP (Top Stories requirement, the lightning badge, Twitter redirection) is gone. Adoption has been shrinking since 2021 and I have not seen a credible reason to start a new AMP implementation since.
How do I check if my site still serves AMP pages?
Crawl the site with Screaming Frog and check for link rel="amphtml" elements (the AMP tab surfaces these directly), or search Google Search Console's performance report filtered by AMP search appearance. Sites often carry forgotten AMP plugins, WordPress installs especially.
What should replace AMP for mobile speed?
Fast canonical pages, full stop. Optimize Largest Contentful Paint and Interaction to Next Paint on your real templates: compress and lazy-load images, cut render-blocking scripts, use a CDN, and measure with PageSpeed Insights and CrUX field data. One fast version of each page beats two versions where one is fast.
Still carrying AMP baggage from 2016?

I audit legacy AMP setups, redirect maps, and mobile performance as part of a full technical review. If you want a clear, prioritized plan for retiring AMP without losing traffic, that is exactly what the audit delivers.

Get an Advanced SEO Audit

Claude Vincent is a technical SEO consultant focused on crawlability, rendering, and AI-search visibility. He writes the field guides and case studies at SEO ProCheck, with a bias toward the durable, unglamorous work that decides whether search engines and AI answer engines can actually read and cite a site.

About SEO ProCheck

Technical SEO consulting and GEO strategy with 20 years of enterprise experience. Case studies, resources, and tools for search and AI visibility.

Work With Me

Technical SEO audits, GEO strategy, site migrations, and international SEO. Hourly consulting for teams who need hands-on support, not just reports.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

More from our blog